The colour of the specimen has totally put me off track. My first impression was a L. inornata, then it swung to L. fuscus, and then to the L. aurora. It might be L. inornatus, L. aurora, L. fuscus, or it might not even be Lamprophis . . . .
Scale counts done by Arcadies and myself are as follows:
Sucaudals = 83 (Used a photo copier)
- - - L. inornatus (45 to 70)
- - - L. capensis (45-71)
- - - L. aurora (35 to 58)
- - - L. fuscus (51-74)
- - - L. swazicus (75-91) – Can’t be this one as it is totally out of its range
- - - L. rufulus (53-86) - Possibility
Midbody = 19
- - - L. inornatus (23)
- - - L. capensis (25-35)
- - - L. aurora (21-23)
- - - L. fuscus (19) - Possibility
- - - L. rufulus (19) - Possibility
Ventrals = 173 (Used a photo copier)
- - - L. inornatus (170-196) - Possibility
- - - L. capensis (186-228)
- - - L. aurora (165-185) - Possibility
- - - L. fuscus (165-202) - Possibility
- - - L. rufulus (158-179) - Possibility
Now another twist to the tail is the spike on the tail which lends itself to a L. aurora as I’m not aware that any of the other Lamprophis family has the spike at the end of its tail, i.e. in the Western Cape (Speaking under correction). The chances of it being a L. capensis (as per SI – Shaun's scale counts) is minuet, but who knows he might be right. I must agree with Dagon Breeder and / or Mongoose that the possibility that it is a L. aurora or a L. fuscus is good, but what about the L. inornatus, what about something other than Lamprophis - - -
As Mongoose pointed out rufulus, just a colour variant. The problem is that it was quite some distance from water, but this won't necessarily mean anything as it could have hitched a ride, or been is someones collection etc etc etc.