It looks like a 99% certainty that it is a lamprophis fuscus
There is so little scientific data available on the fuscus, thus the subcaudals counts could still be re-defined etc. As Froot said “it makes me wonder how many L. fuscus have been mistaken for L. rufulus “. Rumour also has it that Lycodonomorphus might fall away, only to be replaced by lamprophis (Lets wait and see). This, in a way, confirms Froot’s point.
The scale counts etc etc etc are going to be submitted to the HAA and CN. DNA samples will also be taken.
Thanks to all who made a positive contributions to this discussion.