snakemanjayd wrote:Thanks WW.
This is going to sound ignorant, but how do they know the evolutionary decent of a species, if not by considering similarity?
So are the King cobra's hemipenes larger in proportion to its body or just a different structure?
King cobra hemipenes: both: very large, and quite different in shape to
Naja.
Finding out about evolutionary relationships: overall similarity is not a guide, since it may simply be a leftover from a primitive ancestor. For instance, lungfish are more closely related to humans (i.e., we share a more recent common ancestor) than to a trout, even though lungfish and trout are more similar to each other than lungfish and humans - it's just that the "fish" have retained a huge number of similar features, whereas land vertebrates have changed enormously in the same time. the main approach used today is cladistics, which focuses attention on shared, evolutionarily derived characters. This is not easy too explain (it takes me two hours to cover in lectures, and I am travelling at the moment, so I can't explain it all here and now - check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cladistics, although you may find it a bit indigestible).
More importantly nowadays, genetic methods, particularly DNA sequence comparisons, have really taken over the field, and they certainly do confirm that king cobras are very distant to other cobra-like elapids.
Hope this helps!